There was also a ‘prohibited participation in the family team’ in the soccer world… finally allowed to

January 26, 2023 0 Comments

Controversy continues as the terms of the contract not to play against her parent team became known during the transfer of women’s professional volleyball Oh Ji-young (35).

However, there have been cases like this in other sports as well. However, when the problem was raised, it was improved in the direction of eliminating the ‘ban on participation’ clause.

A similar problem has arisen in football.

In 2014, England’s Chelsea and Spain’s Atletico Madrid met in the semifinals of the UEFA Champions League, and it was controversial whether Atletico goalkeeper Courtois would participate.

Courtois was loaned to Atlético from Chelsea. The two clubs agreed at the time that if Courtois plays in the Champions League against Chelsea, Madrid will pay Chelsea 3 million euros for each match. 메이저놀이터

In response, the soccer world raised the players’ hands instead of the club.

Controversy arose over whether or not to participate, and the European Football Federation decided that Courtois should participate. It was the reason that any club other than the current club should not exert influence on the participation.

At the same time, the federation emphasized that even if there is a private contract between the clubs, outside forces should not interfere in the selection of players. The International Football Federation (FIFA) later made the same decision.

There was a similar controversy in Korean soccer, but in the end, it was concluded that players should not be banned.

In the K-League, famous players such as Lee Chun-soo and Stebo were unable to play against their parents’ teams because of concerns that loaned players could slow down or manipulate the match in the match against the original club.

Then, in 2020, the Korea Professional Football Federation banned the setting up of clauses in rental and transfer contracts that prevented participation in games with the original club. There was also a clause in the lease contract for the Armed Forces Sports Unit that the leased player would not participate in the match against the original team, but this clause was also abolished.

It is expected that the volleyball world will improve as similar controversy has been raised this time. It is reported that the Korea Volleyball Federation plans to review improvement plans with the clubs while sympathizing with the awareness of the problem that players’ rights may be violated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *